Watching the different communities around the empire called the internet, I can't help but notice the hilarity what moral guidelines and rules are concerned. Some of the sites committed to the sin of confused and misplaced boundaries are!Nexus
- Don't accept bestiality mods (an example), but if you are in to killing children! www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/…
Running a little girl through is ok because you know. They aren't real. Humping a werewolf however... Well you see the point^^Rule34
- This is a kicker. They used to have this rule. No child porn unless it was in 2D. That was fine. 3D not so much. To realistic was the argument.But see! This CP is not as bad as this CP.
Are you mad Rule34? They had to ban 2D as well because authorities told them to remove it or pay the consequences. They did not manage to reach that decision on their own. Nice going there. The crap is still there though. Seems they are more committed to moronic decisions like removing this
but accepting this
Good spot there Rule34. Big difference
Beside the point, but I had to^^DeviantArt
- Allow people to squeeze their cocks or pussies against the camera lens. But if they see a heinous dildo standing on a table minding it's own business, the mods are obligated to remove this atrocity. Why? Because... Yes try making sense of that one. I sure as hell can't. I want to ask them, but they will probably post a new notice with "updates" no one asked for or for that matter... wanted in return
Violence vs nudity are the real brain twister. On sites where erotica is generally frown upon a single exposed female nipple will often transform the place in to a hen house in an uproar.
But a well executed beheading with all the gory details will not even produce a raised brow. In a global community that so eagerly embrace violence and gore, one would think some gentle erotic poses would be welcome to balance things up.
So what is DigitalEro guilty off? Nuffin. The rules are clear. We are good